Re: mailto::



On 01/11/2010 04:18:06 AM, Peter Bloomfield wrote:
On 01/10/2010 08:09:25 PM Sun, Peter Bloomfield wrote:
Geoffrey:

On 01/10/2010 07:28:50 PM Sun, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
Sigh. I had so hoped that this would not be necessary.

One question. The D/L page mentions gmime 2.2... Does this mean that v
2.4 is not useful?

On the contrary, GMime-2.4 is required for Balsa 2.4.x. Take a look at the new download page <URL:http://pawsa.fedorapeople.org/balsa/download.html>.

Oh, sorry, I just noticed--the new page refers to GMime-2.2, instead of GMime-2.4. That needs updating...


Updated!

But you can get GMime-2.4 from the link on that page. I believe that 2.5 is a development branch leading to a stable 2.6 with some API changes, so you should stay with the latest 2.4.

FWIW, balsa update for fedora is possible but the fedora maintainers like to have a bugzilla ticket to support the need for update (maybe a reference to balsa-list archive will do?)

Pawel


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]