Am 2006.11.01 14:57 schrieb(en) Peter Bloomfield:
On 10/31/2006 11:06:24 PM Tue, Johan Brannlund wrote: > I noticed when trying to mail pictures from f-spot that Balsa didn't > include the attachments. A bit of digging revealed that the reason is > that > Balsa doesn't understand things like > "mailto:helmut example com?attach=/tmp/strudel.jpg" > > I hacked up a small patch for this, included below. In case it suffers > from whitespace damage, it's also available at > http://nullinfinity.org/attach.patch . > > Regards, > > Johan On reflection, implementing "attach=file" has some security implications. Clicking "mailto:some-criminal some-offshore-address?attach=/etc/passwd" on a random web page would probably be a bad idea. Perhaps Balsa should just pop up the attach-file dialog with the target file pre-selected, so that the user has to verify that it's OK to send.
What if there is more than one attach handler? This can get very messy and annoying, can't it? I think it should be enough to see the attachments in the corresponding list.
As to removing Bcc and Cc: Why? But again Balsa should explicitly show these header fields if there are non-standard (from the identity) entries...
Comments? Peter
cu /Steffen -- /"\ \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign | "The best way to predict X * NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | the future is to invent it." / \ * NO MSWord docs in e-mail| -- Alan Kay
Attachment:
pgpqjyqfOcm0U.pgp
Description: PGP signature