Re: new gmime/gpg bug
- From: Albrecht Dreß <albrecht dress arcor de>
- To: Pawel Salek <pawsa theochem kth se>
- Cc: balsa-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: new gmime/gpg bug
- Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 22:42:51 +0200
Am 04.07.04 18:20 schrieb(en) Pawel Salek:
as depracted (e.g. g_mime_part_get_content()).You may remember that I
posted several crypto related improvements already in 2.0 a while ago
which were never accepted (see
and they require gmime 2.1.5 or later.
I guess I can commit that patch if gmime-2.1.5 does not break anything
else: I trust your judgement!
O.k., below is a new version of that big patch - the only differences to
those noted in the message above are that it now works cleanly with
today's cvs, and that the minimum requested gpgme version is 0.9.0, fixing
problems with revoked key certs.
Apart form the Balsa (imap and rfc 3156) and gmime (multipart/signed, but
this seems to improve) problems, there is afaik now only one open gpgme
bug: when using gpg 1.2 configured for automatic key retreival, gpgme
falsely returns a "no data" error if retreiving an unknown key failed
instead of "no key". It has to be fixed in gpgme, though, and the gpg
people claim that it's gone with gpg 1.3/1.9.
Oh, btw, IMHO we should really make gmime 2.1.7 the minimum requested
version; there were some fixes since 2.1.5.
Albrecht Dreß - Johanna-Kirchner-Straße 13 - D-53123 Bonn (Germany)
Phone (+49) 228 6199571 - mailto:albrecht dress arcor de
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Description: PGP signature
] [Thread Prev