Re: new gmime/gpg bug

[Pawel Salek <pawsa theochem kth se>]

On 07/03/2004 09:36:31 PM, Albrecht Dreß wrote:
>  signing process, so I assume this is done by gmime. And I don't  
> think   calling g_mime_multipart_signed_sign() for an object should  
> change  it's  contents, shouldn't it? Furthermore, the source file  
> responsible for  signing in balsa didn't change since 2 months, and  
> it *did* work  before  the latest 2 or 3 gmime cvs upgrades.

On related note: we have gmime-2.1.3 dated 2004.04.01 on the balsa  
website. Would you recommend other version/date?

Pawel