Re: the state of HEAD
- From: Steffen Klemer <masterofheap gmx net>
- To: balsa-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: the state of HEAD
- Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 16:11:29 +0100
Am 2004.02.28 12:36 schrieb(en) Kacper Wysocki:
> Cheers,
> I was just wondering what the state of balsa 2.1 or HEAD was- what
> features are implemented and whether it has a 75% chance of not eating
> my mailboxen alive. I've been looking to try it out for a while but last
> I heard ssl or gss or something wasn't implemented yet. Also, apart from
> gmime, are there any other dependencies that have to be updated to
> bleeding edge (as in more bleeding edge than debian sid)?
The last time I tried it (2 weeks ago) you didn't need anything special
besides perhaps gmime 2.1 (but 2.0 from sid should now work as well)
There were only some minor problems with gtkhtml3 because it's .la file wa
in some way corrupted and had to be hand edited (don't know what it was,
but really simple to solve)
I don't think it will eat your mbox, but a backup is always useful ;) And
be prepared to see *some* crashs ;)
cu
/Steffen
--
/"\
\ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign | "The best way to predict
X * NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | the future is to invent it."
/ \ * NO MSWord docs in e-mail| -- Alan Kay
PGP signature
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]