Re: question about the NEW and REPLIED flags
- From: Pawel Salek <pawsa theochem kth se>
- To: Bart Visscher <magick Linux-Fan com>
- Cc: balsa-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: question about the NEW and REPLIED flags
- Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2003 16:08:54 +0100 (CET)
On Sat, 1 Mar 2003, Bart Visscher wrote:
> The LIBBALSA_MESSAGE_FLAG_NEW is being used for 2 things, the IMAP SEEN
> flag and the IMAP RECENT flag, are there objections to split it up?
No problem. LIBBALSA_MESSAGE_FLAG_NEW corresponds really to negated IMAP
SEEN flag. RECENT IMAP flag is a bit special. For example, when there are
several clients accessing same mailbox, only one of them will see RECENT.
One might even consider ignoring it in a first approximation.
> Also hen trying to split the LIBBALSA_MESSAGE_FLAG_NEW flag, I noticed
> this in filter.c:
> case CONDITION_FLAG:
> /* NOTE : nothing about replied flag in the IMAP protocol,
> so continue if only this flag is present */
> if (!(cond->match.flags & ~LIBBALSA_MESSAGE_FLAG_REPLIED))
> continue;
>
> But looking at rfc2060 I find this:
> \Answered Message has been answered
>
> Should that be changed?
True: the comment in the code is false.
Pawel
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]