Re: Broken PGP signature [WAS: Re: inline gpg signatures?]

Le 08.12.2003 19:44:46, Albrecht Dreß a écrit :
> Am 08.12.03 16:39 schrieb(en) Kacper Wysocki:
>> Sure, since the message is stored in a public archive I'm sure the  
>> author won't mind.
> The "Content-Type:" parameter of this message does not contain the  
> mandatory "micalg" parameter, so balsa says it's invalid. You can  
> compare this with a message where the signature is detected  
> successfully:
> Content-Type: multipart/signed;
>    boundary="----------=_1070488729-3050-42";
>    protocol="application/pgp-signature"

Completely (or almost) OT here : the new gpg support works really great  
here! And honorig the gnupg config file options (like auto-retrieve) is  
really appreciated here ;-)

PGP signature

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]