Re: Locking again

[Emmanuel <e allaud wanadoo fr>]

On 08.08.2002 06:59 Carlos Morgado wrote:
> 
> On 2002.08.08 11:30:46 +0100 Emmanuel wrote:
>> 	Hi all,
>> I would suggest a (temporary) fix for the locking problem : we should 
>> just not drop the gdk lock before calling the imap functions at the 
>> very beginning. This is not optimal from a performance viewpoint but as 
>> we know we'll need it in the middle of the mutt transaction (i.e. with 
>> the mutt
> 
> that was the old way, it sucked the life out of the UI. meanwhile pawel
> cunningly moved the UI stuff to the main thread so that we don't need
> the gdk lock in *that* thread. seems to work :)
> 
OK now I understand the libbalsa_get_main_thread call, and that's the good 
way to do it. But is it sure that there's no deadlock with it? Bye
Manu