Re: balsa+libesmtp bug
- From: Carlos Morgado <chbm chbm nu>
- To: Balsa List <balsa-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: balsa+libesmtp bug
- Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 14:37:41 +0100
On 2001.05.04 13:38:25 +0100 Brian Stafford wrote:
> On Fri, 4 May 12:31 Carlos Morgado wrote:
> | The reply codes to each rctp to: command are not being parsed
> | correctly
>
> The reply codes *are* parsed correctly. This is fundamental
> to the correct operation of the SMTP client.
>
yes, sorry i meant the correct action is not being taken by balsa
(thinko was, balsa+esmtp is not parsing correctly the situation)
> | and balsa+libesmtp believes blindly the "250 message accepted" code.
>
> At present, Balsa cannot handle resending only the failed recipients
> of a message. The smtp_option_require_all_recipients() API is a
> quick hack for Balsa's benefit and was intended to abort the session
> if *any* recipients were rejecetd by the SMTP server.
>
this seems more resonable than flaging succeful delivery when only the
Bcc: (which actually is sent@chbm.nu) is accepted.
> The bug is actually in the implementation of
> smtp_option_require_all_recipients() which complicates the protocol
> engine more than I'd like if done properly.
>
ok
> I would prefer that Balsa handled this situation rather than have the
> smtp_option_require_all_recipients() API which is amazingly ugly.
> I'd really like to remove this API rather than fix it.
>
ok
> One possibility that comes to mind is to record recipient status in
> messages in the outbox and only send to recipients that have either
> not been tried previously or have a transient failure (4xx) recorded
> against them. Finally, the message would be removed from the outbox
> to the sentbox only when all recipients are accepted.
>
seems correct except for the auto Bcc: case. i think it should only
be sent to auto-bcc after all other recipients are succefuly handled.
in fact, i think auto-bcc should be handled when moving to sentbox as i
don't see any use for it other than having a remote sentbox
> It occurs to me that a better solution to this problem than
> smtp_option_require_all_recipients() is to add a new API that enumerates
> outstanding recipients of a message, along the lines of
> smtp_enumerate_recipients(). This API could be used to create, say,
> an X-Envelope-Recipient: header in outbox messages which could be used
> to generate the recipient list for a message when the user attempts to
> resend it to the failed recipients.
>
there should also be more feedback to the user about recipients with 5xx
errors and possibly abort the send and move the message back to draftbox
in that case.
--
Carlos Morgado - chbm(at)chbm(dot)nu - http://chbm.nu/ -- gpgkey: 0x1FC57F0A
http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/ FP:0A27 35D3 C448 3641 0573 6876 2A37 4BB2 1FC5 7F0A
Software is like sex; it's better when it's free. - Linus Torvalds
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]