Re: Full Headers?



Er, yes, thats why I mentioned 2822 in parens.. I dont beleive, however,
that 2822 makes any significant changes to the format often referred to as
"RFC-822" format, other than possibly a rename to "RFC-2822" format..

On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Brian Stafford wrote:

> On Mon,  9 July 22:15 balsa@microwave.com wrote:
>
> > Even if this part gets fixed, tt would still be a good idea to have a
> > "View full unparsed, undecoded message source" that would show the message
> > in standard RFC822 (2822?)  format, headers and body. Also nice would be a
>
> RFC 821, RFC 974, parts of RFC 1123, RFC 1869 and RFC 822 are obsolete.
> They should no longer be referred to.  RFC 2821 and RFC 2822 replace them.
>
> Brian
>





[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]