Re: gpg support/libmutt

[Ian Campbell <ijc25 cam ac uk>]

If we are moving to remove libmutt (even in the long term) surely we would
be better to not add any new dependencies on it?

I think it would be much better to implement our own GPG support in
libbalsa.

Ian

On 2000-11-28 14:21:14 +0000 Pawel Salek wrote:
> 
> On 2000-11-28 15:10:41 +0100 Oliver wrote:
> > I grabbed mutt 1.2.5 and have been trying to 
> > convince the pgp*.[ch] files to work in the
> > libmutt subdir of balsa 1.0.
> > 
> > Anyway, they seem slightly mismatched.  
> > Does anyone have the original pgp files for
> > the version of mutt involved?  Or can tell
> > me what version of mutt it was?
> 
> It was 0.96, I believe. Some of the files (IMAP comes to my mind) were
> updated to 1.2.5. If you have any particular files in mind that should be
> updated, just let me know.
> 
> /Pawel
> -- 
> Pawel Salek (pawsa@theochem.kth.se) http://www.theochem.kth.se/~pawsa/
> Theoretical Chemistry Division, KTH voice: +46 8 790-8202
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> balsa-list mailing list
> balsa-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/balsa-list
> 



-- 
Ian Campbell
Churchill College, Cambridge.