Re: spell-check.c in

On Tue, 02 May 2000 16:52:11 Fellmann Joaquim wrote:
> On Tue, 02 May 2000 20:20:00 Pawel Salek wrote:
> > I see two solutions: a. spell-check.c is left in and is
> > included in the tarball; b. spell-check.c is removed from
> > 
> Don't know what it is supposed to do, but it doesn't check anything
> so b) seems the better solution.

If you look at src/, spell-check.c isn't even built --
as far as I remember it doesn't even compile. Or it might compile
but fail to link. If that's the case, IMHO it's pretty clear that
we don't want to translate it.

Peter Williams

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]