- From: <blackie sfcc net>
- To: glennm mediaone net
- cc: balsa-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Configuration
- Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 22:34:58 -0500 (EST)
Objects for each mailbox including configuration settings?
On Tue, 2 Mar 1999 email@example.com wrote:
> Here's one issue about GUI mail clients in general: they're incredibly
> I use mutt. I have different settings for different traffic: different From:
> line, different .sig's, different PGP options, and so on. Mutt lets me do
> this with its configuration: different settings are set with different (text)
> options, ie "my_hdr From: Glenn Maynard <firstname.lastname@example.org>", and I can hook different settings to different mailboxes with "folder-hook foo
> my_hdr From: Glenn ...".
> This gives me a lot of flexibility that isn't available in (to my knowledge)
> any existing GUI MUA. I'd like to use one (they fit in better then mutt in
> an Eterm), but I can't "scale down" my needs.
> However, this configuration scheme doesn't fit in with Balsa/Gnome's model,
> and I havn't been able to think up a decent one that would. Having completely
> separate configuration settings for each mailbox won't do; it'd be a huge
> amount of work, and it'd be inconvenient. (Adding other things to help this,
> like a "change this option for all mailboxes", is just kludgy and slow.)
> Adding individual per-mbox options will work for individuals--I could add a
> list of From's for different boxes, along with a default; I'd have to do
> something similar for .sigs, PGP (which, of course, doesn't exist yet--but
> that's for the future), and so on. This would make changing these settings
> difficult (what if you later wanted to have an option to either run a program
> to generate a sig, or just read a file, as it does now? You'd have to deal
> with the multiple mailbox stuff, complicating things.) Also, this doesn't
> allow real flexibility: you can't do the unexpected things (what if I wanted
> one mailbox to use vim to edit messages, and have the rest use the internal
> Does anyone have any ideas of a configuration model that would fit in with
> Gnome, and give something comparable to mutt's flexibility?
> - Glenn
> FAQ: Frequently-Asked Questions at http://www.gnome.org/gnomefaq
> To unsubscribe: mail email@example.com with
> "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
] [Thread Prev