Re: libfetchmail (was Re: Camel)
- From: Mikael Hermansson <mikeh bahnhof se>
- To: balsa-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: libfetchmail (was Re: Camel)
- Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 19:39:57 +0200 (CEST)
On Tue, 15 Jun 1999, Anthony Joseph Seward wrote:
> Is there any reason for not making a libfetchmail? It seems to me that most
> of the functionality for a transport library is already in the fetchmail
> program. All that remains is to seperate what would be useful for a library
> from the fetchmail interface and the add any functionality that it currently
> lacks. Is there some problem with this?
> Just a suggestion.
IMHO! I dont understand this discussions about POP3/IMAP/SMTP.
That all the people on the list is talking about :-)
First of all we need to have a good gnomebased mail "reader"
that have all features as pine/mutt, search functions and other
important stuff. In the moment balsa bug as hell and is unusabel as
Fetchmail/Sendmail is doing the other things greats as daemons :-)
When we have a good working mailer then we should start talking about
implement POP3/SMTP/IMAP as libs or maybe use gnome-mailer codebase.
Just IMHO, dont want to start any flamewar :-)
Check out my Linux page at:
] [Thread Prev