Hi Nuritzi
I will send this mail to the mail address board-list gnome org in a day, thank you for your help on this issue.On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Nuritzi Sanchez <nuritzis stanfordalumni org> wrote:Hi everyone,Sorry for the late follow up here. After talking to the Board, it seems like just sending an email with the logo you plan to use this year and a request for us to approve it would suffice. We just need to get something in writing.Can you please send a short email with a description of how you plan on using the logo (e.g. on the website, on merchandise), and an attachment of the logo to board-list gnome org? This can be just a few sentences.Please let us know if you have any more questions about this. We're in the process of tightening up our copyright/trademark use and so your feedback along the way will help us in future years.Thank you very much!!Best,Nuritzi--On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 8:22 PM, Sammy Fung <sammy opensource hk> wrote:Hi,May we know how did/will Foundation get a trademark assignment for the GUADEC use of the logo ?I guess that GUADEC also changes organiser every year, and we may consider to get it for GNOME Asia with same method.On Tue, 13 Jun 2017 at 11:03, Max <sakanamax hotmail com> wrote:Hi
Maybe GNOME.Asia committee could written agreement?
Cause all of us make GNOME forward in Asia, right?
Max
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 10:31 AM, Arun Raghavan <arun accosted net> wrote:
> On 13 June 2017 at 04:39, Nuritzi Sanchez <nuritzis stanfordalumni org> wrote:
>> Hi Bin Li,
>>
>> Thanks for your quick response to our request!
>>
>> Regarding the copyright question - I think we may need to explicitly have a
>> written agreement in place to acknowledge that you are using GNOME's logo
>> and trademark in a way that does not comply with the usual trademark and
>> logo terms of use. We'll discuss this during tomorrow's meeting and let you
>> know what else to do.
>
> One thing I'm curious about here -- who would such an agreement be with?
>
> Since the organising team is different every year, we don't really
> have a central entity (or any sort of entity at all), and I've always
> viewed GNOME Asia being under the ambit of the GNOME Foundation in
> some sense.
>
> Probably something to figure out so we make sure the GNOME IP is
> protected while keeping the overhead of running this event at a
> minimum.
>
> Cheers,
> Arun
> _______________________________________________
> asia-summit-list mailing list
> asia-summit-list gnome org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/asia-summit-list
_______________________________________________
asia-summit-list mailing list
asia-summit-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/asia-summit-list
--............................................................ .................