Re: [anjuta-devel] Anjuta name

[Johannes Schmid <jhs jsschmid de>]

Hi!

I don't have a very strong opinion but I think just "Anjuta" is fine. It
could be useful to actually use a macro wherever the name is used in code
and to define it in the preprocessor. But that won't work for the docs and
things like that of course.

Regards,
Johannes


On Tue, 01 Jan 2013 22:12:00 +0100, Sébastien Granjoux <seb sfo free fr>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> There is a new bug report asking to synchronize the name of Anjuta.
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=690944
>
> Currently, it is called Anjuta, Anjuta IDE and Anjuta DevStudio. Do you 
> think we should remove one of these names?
>
> For me, I think Anjuta alone is fine but perhaps it make sense to keep 
> DevStudio when used in a more general context.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Sébastien
> _______________________________________________
> anjuta-devel-list mailing list
> anjuta-devel-list gnome org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/anjuta-devel-list