Re: [Tracker] Modification of nmm ontology

[Adrien Bustany <madcat mymadcat com>]

On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 01:18:02 +0100, Ivan Frade <ivan frade gmail com>
wrote:
> hi,
>
>  I think that property should have cardinality N. It looks like a bug
> in the ontology.
OK, if we can push that fix then...

>  On the other hand, nobody is using yet that property. Is anybody
> working on a miner retrieving data from imdb? }:-)
Sssshhhh don't tell it, it's a secret!

> ivan
>
> On 2/18/10, Philip Van Hoof <spam pvanhoof be> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 23:07 +0100, Adrien Bustany wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > in the nmm ontology, we currently have nmm:leadActor, with a max
> > > cardinality of 1. What should I do if I want to store more actors ?
> > > Creating a "virtual" artist with a comma delimited name seems quite
> > > hackish
> >
> >
> > Can you give us a full use-case for this?
> >
> >
> > --
> > Philip Van Hoof, freelance software developer
> > home: me at pvanhoof dot be
> > gnome: pvanhoof at gnome dot org
> > http://pvanhoof.be/blog
> > http://codeminded.be
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > tracker-list mailing list
> > tracker-list gnome org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-list