Re: conflict resolution in Meld



On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Kai Willadsen <kai willadsen gmail com> wrote:
On 22 April 2013 22:55, Adam Dingle <adam medovina org> wrote:
I'm trying to understand the state of conflict resolution (for git) in Meld
today.  I know this is a new feature and there have been a bunch of messages
about this on this mailing list in the last few months, but those are
somewhat detailed and I'm trying to get the big picture.

I'm using meld from git master.  When I run git mergetool on the command
line, I see a meld comparison with LOCAL, BASE and REMOTE.  I can merge
changes from LOCAL and REMOTE into BASE and save them, and they end up in
the working directory in a place that git understands.  In short, this works
pretty well.

When I open Meld in source control view and double click a conflicting file,
I see something completely different.  I see three panes presenting REMOTE,
MERGED (i.e. git's merge output with conflict markers) and LOCAL.  All three
of these panes point to files in /tmp which are read-only.  I can merge my
changes into the central pane, but can't save them without manually choosing
a filename to save to.  This seems much less useful.

Questions:

1. It seems strange to me that opening a conflicting file from Meld's source
control view produces a different result than running git mergetool.
Shouldn't these be exactly the same?  Will they be?

It would be nice, but git mergetool stuff defaults are shipped by Git,
and they've chosen to use BASE instead of MERGED. I'm starting to
think that I'm the only person in the world who wants my conflicts
pre-merged in there, so the Meld default may change in the future.

You are definitely not the only one. That is the default configuration
for most merge tools that is used by mercurial. In fact the next
version of mercurial change the order and naming of the merge panels
to: local, merged, base, and will enable mercurial's "premerge"
setting. We discussed enabling the --auto-merge option but there were
backward compatibility concerns so for now that has not been done yet
(although it is thought to be desirable).

Cheers,

Angel


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]