В сообщении от 9 апреля 2010 20:18:44 автор Michael Torrie написал: > I can't speak for the acceleration issue, but I am pretty sure that 32 > mb of RAM is plenty for running an X-based GTK on the Xephyr X server. > Even 8 years ago I ran GTK on X11 on a 32 MB ram handheld computer using > Kdrive, the forerunner of Xephyr. > > Certainly I don't see how Xephyr + GTK is going to use very much more > ram than DirectFB backend + GTK. Keep in mind that the GDK layer in > DirectFB has to implement many of the windowing primitives itself that > X11 provides, so the savings provided by DirectFB in the memory usage > department would appear to be nil. According to Xephyr README, Xephyr is a kdrive server that outputs to a window on a pre-existing 'host' X display, maybe you mean Xfbdev (kdrive-based), not Xephyr? Regards Vasily
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.