Re: [gnet-dev] ghttp for gnet ?

[Juergen Schoenwaelder <schoenw ibr cs tu-bs de>]

>>>>> fredo  writes:

fredo> are there any guidelines for someone how wants to rewrite ghttp
fredo> ontop of gnet ?

fredo> would the function-calls be gnet_http_... ?

fredo> also i think that gnet needs a ssl-iochannel, or better convert
fredo> a exiting iochannel into a ssl-one as is required by http/1.1.

A related but more fundamental question: Do we want protocol
implementations on top of gnet to be standalone packages or would it
not make sense to have a single gnet package which comes with a bunch
of protocol implementations (naturally maintained by different
persons)?

As a user of gnet, I would prefer if all the good stuff comes in one
package which is consistent and works out of the box rather than
having to pick up several gnet-based protocol implementations that
potentially over time require different gnet versions to work.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder    <http://www.informatik.uni-osnabrueck.de/schoenw/>