On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 11:02 -0400, Bryan Quigley wrote:
Sounds fine to me.. Any objection to just moving games source files to GPLv3+? Or, to put it another way; why keep them at GPLv2+?
I'm fine with moving them to GPLv3+ as well, but there is an advantage to keeping them GPLv2+: it would allow GNOME programs with the older license to copy code from us. This doesn't matter too much, though, as that's hardly something that will happen often.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part