Re: [Evolution] Multiple instances of evolution

[Not Zed <notzed novell com>]

On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 14:02 -0700, JP Rosevear wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 09:32 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
> >On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 17:19 -0700, JP Rosevear wrote: 
> >>On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 10:34 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
> >>> 
> >>> I don't see how any such patch could possibly work very well, so i
> >>> wouldn't get too excited about it.
> >>
> >>Why not?  As noted the main thing is the two separate camel sessions.
> >
> >Yes, two separate camel sessions.  Thats certainly a show-stopper for
> >this 'working very well', don't you think?
>
> Umm, yes, and thats a) why its not in and b) what I originally stated
> several messages ago.  I thought you were implying there was some
> additional major issue that I had not already covered.

Well i dont think that was made very clear, i.e. that not sharing the camel session is a critical shortcomming.

I didn't want the sun engineers or redhat engineers getting all excited and trying install the patch, when it wouldn't work too well!  Thats all!