[evolution-kolab-devel] evolution-kolab versus citadel



Le jeudi 18 août 2011 à 16:48 +0200, Christian Hilberg a écrit : 
> Hi again,
> 
> Am Donnerstag 18 August 2011, um 13:06:26 schrieb jens:
> > Hello Christian,
> > [...]
> > Citadel you just install and it runs without any configuration.

In the meantime I had a look into the citadel code:
citadel-7.86/modules/imap/imap_metadata.c

	/*
	 * Extract the folder type without any parentheses.  Then learn
	 * the Citadel view type based on the supplied folder type.
	 */
	extract_token(set_value, Params[5].Key, 0, ')', sizeof set_value);
	if (!strncasecmp(set_value, "mail", 4)) {
		set_view = VIEW_MAILBOX;
	}
	else if (!strncasecmp(set_value, "event", 5)) {
		set_view = VIEW_CALENDAR;
	}
	else if (!strncasecmp(set_value, "contact", 7)) {
		set_view = VIEW_ADDRESSBOOK;
	}
	else if (!strncasecmp(set_value, "journal", 7)) {
		set_view = VIEW_JOURNAL;
	}
	else if (!strncasecmp(set_value, "note", 4)) {
		set_view = VIEW_NOTES;
	}
	else if (!strncasecmp(set_value, "task", 4)) {
		set_view = VIEW_TASKS;
	}
	else {
		set_view = VIEW_MAILBOX;
	}



> Just checked on the citadel website: it states there that citadel is Kolab-1 
> compatible, while evolution-kolab implements Kolab-2 only. This can also be a 
> source of any kind of trouble. 

I think so too.

> Trying evolution-kolab against a non-Kolab-2 
> server might just not be worth the pain, at least unless evolution-kolab has 
> matured much more.

Yes. I will give 
	debian kolabd 2.2.4-2010
another try. 

As I understood it is your dev server version.

Grüße



Jens

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]