Re: gecko vs. gtkhtml



On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 22:40 +0100, Alexander Nagel wrote:
> Hi everybody,
> i don't want to mess anybody up but i'm just curious why epiphany uses gecko and not gtkhtml?
> Is gtkhtml so bad for a browser?

In short... yes. Unfathomably horrible. It just doesn't have what it
takes; it's written do display emails.

It wouldn't be difficult to plug in a gtkhtml renderer instead of gecko.
There was one for Galeon a long time ago, before the fork. But it
renders badly.

-- 
Adam Hooper <adamh densi com>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]