[Off-topic] Re: 0.96 pre

["Young, Robert" <Robert Young dsto defence gov au>]

> christian.ridderstrom wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Mar 2007, Young, Robert wrote:
>
> > Rob.
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> > IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Australian Defence 
> > Organisation and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the 
> > CRIMES ACT 1914.  If you have received this email in error, you are 
> > requested to contact the sender and delete the email.
>
> I don't think you meant to send me this specifically, so I've 
> been a nice boy and deleted the mail. Oh, and this is 
> contacting you of course ;-)
>
> Oh.... damn... I just realized that when I cut away parts of 
> your post, I was took liberties with property of the 
> Australian Defence Organisation. 
> Much Sorry ;-) ;-) ;-)
>
> Have a Nice Weekend!
> /Christian
>
> PS. I understand Rob may not have any say over what he puts in 
> his signature, but IMHO that kind of signature is a waste of 
> bandwidth...

Apologies for the wasted bandwidth - until you wrote this I didn't know
that this was happening. Unfortunately there's nothing I can do to stop
it, sorry.

I guess all I can say is that you're not receiving this email in error
:-)

Rob.