[gimp-help-2] Two bugfixes

[Ulf-D. Ehlert <ulfehlert src gnome org>]

commit 2180500866eaf04d179c9c87c59dcabb1e1b821a
Author: Ulf-D. Ehlert <ulfehlert svn gnome org>
Date:   Thu Jul 5 20:01:53 2012 +0200

    Two bugfixes
    
    * Bug #676683: Docs use the term "dpi", GIMP UI uses "ppi"
    * Bug #679173: Grammatical error in Help Browser

 src/concepts/tools-presets.xml |    4 ++--
 src/menus/image/print-size.xml |    4 ++--
 src/menus/view/dot-for-dot.xml |   16 ++++++++--------
 src/using/fileformats.xml      |    4 +---
 src/using/photography.xml      |   19 ++++++++++---------
 5 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/src/concepts/tools-presets.xml b/src/concepts/tools-presets.xml
index 9f031c7..4898146 100755
--- a/src/concepts/tools-presets.xml
+++ b/src/concepts/tools-presets.xml
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
   <para>
     Paint tools, which are normally in Toolbox, have a preset system that have
     been much improved with <acronym>GIMP</acronym>-2.8. Color tools (except
-    Posterize and Desaturate), which are not normally in Toolbox, have there 
+    Posterize and Desaturate), which are not normally in Toolbox, have their
     own preset system.
   </para>
 
@@ -50,4 +50,4 @@
 
     
 
-  
\ No newline at end of file
+  
diff --git a/src/menus/image/print-size.xml b/src/menus/image/print-size.xml
index 1febaed..e208968 100644
--- a/src/menus/image/print-size.xml
+++ b/src/menus/image/print-size.xml
@@ -64,8 +64,8 @@
     <para>
       The output resolution determines the number of pixels used per unit
       length for the printed image. Do not confuse the output resolution
-      with the printer resolution, which is expressed in dpi (dots per
-      inch); several dots are used to print a pixel.
+      with the printer's resolution, which is a printer feature and expressed
+      in dpi (dots per inch); several dots are used to print a pixel.
     </para>
     <para>
       When the dialog is displayed, the resolution shown in the boxes is the
diff --git a/src/menus/view/dot-for-dot.xml b/src/menus/view/dot-for-dot.xml
index 53f95f4..a6c47e1 100644
--- a/src/menus/view/dot-for-dot.xml
+++ b/src/menus/view/dot-for-dot.xml
@@ -33,25 +33,25 @@
       <para>Image size: 100x100 pixels</para>
     </listitem>
     <listitem>
-      <para>Image resolution: 300dpi (dots per inch)</para>
+      <para>Image resolution: 300 ppi (pixels per inch)</para>
     </listitem>
     <listitem>
       <para>
         Image displayed with Zoom=100%, <quote>Dot for Dot</quote>
-        <emphasis>enabled</emphasis>: 100x100 pixels
+        <emphasis>enabled</emphasis>:
       </para>
+      <blockquote><para>100x100 pixels</para></blockquote>
     </listitem>
     <listitem>
       <para>
         Image displayed with Zoom=100%, <quote>Dot for Dot</quote>
         <emphasis>disabled</emphasis>:
       </para>
-      <informalequation>
-        <alt role="latex">
-          $100pixels \div 300dpi = \frac{1}{3} inch \approx 0.85cm$
-        </alt>
-        <graphic fileref="images/math/dot-for-dot.png" />
-      </informalequation>
+      <blockquote>
+        <para>
+          100 pixels &divide; 300 ppi = 1/3 inch &cong; 0.85 cm
+        </para>
+      </blockquote>
     </listitem>
   </itemizedlist>
   <para>
diff --git a/src/using/fileformats.xml b/src/using/fileformats.xml
index bd6bfdd..adcc8fb 100755
--- a/src/using/fileformats.xml
+++ b/src/using/fileformats.xml
@@ -668,9 +668,7 @@
         <varlistentry>
           <term>Save Resolution</term>
           <listitem>
-            <para>
-              Save the image resolution, in DPI (dots per inch).
-            </para>
+            <para>Save the image resolution, in ppi (pixels per inch).</para>
           </listitem>
         </varlistentry>
         <varlistentry>
diff --git a/src/using/photography.xml b/src/using/photography.xml
index bb06be6..072e187 100644
--- a/src/using/photography.xml
+++ b/src/using/photography.xml
@@ -690,15 +690,16 @@
           <para>
             If you intend to print the image on paper, you should avoid
             shrinking the image, except by cropping it. The reason is that
-            printers are capable of achieving much higher dot resolutions than
-            video monitors---600 to 1400 dots per inch for typical printers,
-            as compared to 72 to 100 dots per inch for monitors. A 3000 x 5000
-            image looks huge on a monitor, but it only comes to about 5 inches
-            by 8 inches on paper at 600 dpi. There is usually no good reason
-            to <emphasis>expand</emphasis>
-            the image either: you can't increase the true resolution that way,
-            and it can always be scaled up at the time it is printed. As for
-            the file format, it will usually be fine to use JPEG at a quality
+            printers are capable of achieving much higher resolutions than
+            video monitors &mdash; 600 to 1400 dpi (<quote>dots per
+            inch</quote>, the physical density) for typical printers, as
+            compared to 72 to 100 pixels per inch for monitors. A
+            3000&nbsp;x&nbsp;5000-pixel image looks huge on a monitor, but it
+            only comes to about 5 inches by 8 inches on paper at 600 ppi.
+            There is usually no good reason to <emphasis>expand</emphasis> the
+            image either: you can't increase the true resolution that way, and
+            it can always be scaled up at the time it is printed. As for the
+            file format, it will usually be fine to use JPEG at a quality
             level of 75 to 85. In rare cases, where there are large swaths of
             nearly uniform color, you may need to set the quality level even
             higher or use a lossless format such as TIFF instead.