William M. Brack wrote:
Daniel Veillard wrote:On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 03:05:57PM -0500, joel reed wrote:Daniel Veillard wrote:
snip
the frame #6 is the xsl:copy implementation and that's the one doing the copy of the value returned on the XPath evaluation. I must be tired I can't see what's wrong, this has to be related to the way the function work but it looks fine and we get the problem when we use the result ... I'm puzzled. DanielLooks to me as though the leak has nothing to do with Joel, but rather comes from transform.c (somewhere around 4307 in SVN). I'll have that fixed fairly soon, and get it (together with Joel's patches) committed later today.
Bill to the rescue! Very glad to hear you tracked this down. I was struggling to find a missed allocation/free pair in my code.
jr
begin:vcard fn:Joel Reed n:Reed;Joel org:Development Dimensions International;E-Systems adr;dom:;;1225 Washington Pike;Bridgeville;PA;15017 title:Manager, E-Products R&D tel;work:412-257-3881 note;quoted-printable:Unleashing Executive Talent. Hiring & Promoting The Best.=0D=0A= Developing Extraordinary Leaders. Discover how at www.ddiworld.com x-mozilla-html:FALSE version:2.1 end:vcard