[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [xml] XQuery
- From: "Elvis Stansvik" <elvstone gmail com>
- To: "Liam R E Quin" <liam holoweb net>
- Cc: Micah Dubinko <micah dubinko info>, xml gnome org, veillard redhat com
- Subject: Re: [xml] XQuery
- Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 19:51:17 +0200
2008/9/25 Liam R E Quin <liam holoweb net>:
> On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 19:06 +0200, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> [...]
>> XQuery doesn't make that much sense when playing with a single document,
>
> There are several implementations of XQuery that work on a single
> document and that people say are useful.
>
>
>> my feeling is that it's more fit for a set/database of documents,
>> i.e. libxml2 might be used to implement an XQuery engine on top of
>> some database but just for within libxml2 it's not worth it.
>
> As it stands today I don't know how good a fit libxml would be --
> for XPath 2, nodes are typed, so you'd wanting to make some changes.
> Certainly you could use libxml's XMLReader API to build data model
> instances, though, and/or tie in to the W3C XML Schema validation.
>
> dbxml (which uses Quilla) is a viable alternative for many people,
> and the FLWOR Foundation is funding another, both in C++. If you
> are doing work in KDE, there's also an implementation from TrollTech
> (Nokia now).
Just to clarify, you need not be doing work in KDE to use the
implementation in Qt. Qt != KDE. In fact you could use just the QtXml
and QtCore modules of Qt, and not have to link to all of the Qt
library.
Elvis
>
> Liam
>
>
> --
> Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
> Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
> Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org www.advogato.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/
> xml gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
>
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]