[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [xml] DOM vs xmlReader
- From: Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>
- To: Prashant R <ramapra gmail com>
- Cc: xml gnome org
- Subject: Re: [xml] DOM vs xmlReader
- Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 14:23:11 +0100
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 05:22:58PM -0800, Prashant R wrote:
> My question is that , given this scenario , does xmlreader still save me
> memory ,compared to DOM ( in terms of storage allocated for parsing xml) as
> bytes from the stream would need to still
> be cached to decipher node information.
DOM builds the full tree in memory. The reader building one a
fraction of the tree in memory at a given time. The reader should
save memory. Testing should confirm this.
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
daniel veillard com | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]