Re: [xml] new tree.c function

[dhk <dhkuhl optonline net>]

That was it . . . it was the namespace.

Thanks,
Dave

Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 04:26:03AM +0000, dhk wrote:
> > Dan,
> >
> > I wrote the function that does what xpath should do because xpath didn't 
> > seem to work on a xmlDocPtr created with xmlNewDoc().  However, xpath 
> > works fine if I create an xmlDocPtr with the xmlParseFile()function.
> >
> > Any ideas?
>
>   You probably made mistakes when building the tree, a classic is
> a default namespace defined on an element but not linked as being the
> one for the element. Happens if you only look at the serialization instead
> of the tree structure.
>
> Daniel