[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [xml] DOM Base URI (xml:base, RFC 2396)
- From: "Daniel O'Connor" <daniel oconnor gmail com>
- To: veillard redhat com, xml gnome org, "Rob Richards" <rrichards ctindustries net>
- Subject: Re: [xml] DOM Base URI (xml:base, RFC 2396)
- Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 22:12:52 +1030
Ah bugger.
Document.baseURI vs Document.documentElement.baseURI
I hereby eat my words.
Thanks for the clarifications.
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 7:40 PM, Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 09:59:30PM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> > Hey all,
> > I'm causing trouble for Richard by asking for things like:
> > http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=44367
> >
> > Basically, what happens in the following scenarios with the baseURI of
> > a document?
> >
> > 1. A document is loaded from a URI (http://foo.com/)
> > 2. An xhtml document is loaded from a URI (http://foo.com/), but has
> > a <base href="http://bar.com/" />
> > 3. An xml document is loaded from a URI, but has an <Foo
> > xml:base="http://bar.com/" />
> > 4. An xml document is loaded from a URI, which was redirected (GET
> > http://foo.com/ redirected to http://bar.com/)
> > 5. An xml document is loaded, and has an xml:base attribute - but
> > it's not on the root element (/Foo/bar[ xml:base])
> >
> >
> > >From what I read of http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2396.html, section 5.1
> > & on, I think it should be:
> >
> > 1. http://foo.com/
> > 2. http://foo.com/
> > 2a. Unless the implementation understands xhtml / html - http://bar.com/
>
> that's an interpretation on top of the original XML view
>
> > 3. http://bar.com/
>
> Wrong, the base applies only to the element carrying the xml:base and below.
> If you ask for the *document base* the document node is an ancestor of Foo
> and the answer is still the original URI
>
> > 4. http://bar.com/
>
> xmlCheckHTTPInput does this, it's called by xmlNewInputFromFile() in libxml2
> it is possible it may be missing in some case, or the PHP I/O architecture
> doesn't do something similar.
>
> > 5. http://foo.com/
>
> Wrong, same misunderstanding as 3/
>
>
> >
> > The current behavior for PHP (using libxml2 2.6.31) isn't that.
>
> I can't tell for PHP, but at least 2 of your expectations are clearly
> wrong from purely a spec perspective.
>
> Daniel
>
> --
> Red Hat Virtualization group http://redhat.com/virtualization/
> Daniel Veillard | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/
> veillard redhat com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
> http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
>
--
Looking for a new php job? See what you can do with
https://vx.valex.com.au/tests/season/
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]