[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [xml] Problems with schema validation
- From: Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml behnel de>
- To: Robert Schweikert <robert schweikert mathworks com>
- Cc: xml gnome org
- Subject: Re: [xml] Problems with schema validation
- Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:26:13 +0200
Hi,
Robert Schweikert wrote:
> Hi I am trying to validate xsd files and am running into a problem. I
> have a negative test, i.e. a file I know is invalid, yet it passes
> validation.
>
> I used the example code from
> http://wiki.njh.eu/XML-Schema_validation_with_libxml2 and wrote a short
> main routine for the test.
>
> I downloaded the http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema.xsd file to my machine
> to avoid any network issues.
>
> So here is the file I am validating and I expect this to fail:
>
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
> <!-- Invalid Schema definition used in the XML tools tests (no flip
> type)-->
> <xsd:schema xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
> <xsd:element name="person" type="person"/>
> <xsd:complexType name="person">
> <xsd:sequence>
> <xsd:element name="first" type="xsd:flip"/>
> <xsd:element name="last" type="xsd:string"/>
> <xsd:element name="dob" type="xsd:date"/>
> <xsd:element name="phone" type="xsd:string"/>
> </xsd:sequence>
> </xsd:complexType>
> </xsd:schema>
>
> XSD defines no flip type, thus the validator should complain. I have
> libxml2.so.2.6.27 on my Debian 4 box.
It passes for me also in 2.6.32. However, the W3C schema validator only
complains when I check the option "check as complete schema", otherwise, it
passes without complaint. Still, libxml2 might be better off considering a
schema it parses a complete one.
Does it complain when you try to validate XML documents with this schema?
Stefan
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]