Re: [xml] Better hash function for dict.c

[Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>]

On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 06:59:33PM +0200, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Daniel Veillard wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:05:03AM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> >>   Since you seems to be interested in the performances of the hash 
> >> algorithm, I tried to drop the string comparisons on lookup when possible
> >> I have an old patch for this which I'm enclosing, but I never applied it
> >> since I had problems at the time (can't remember why/where, it's just 
> >> a FYI patch ;-)
> > 
> >   Of course I forgot the patch in the first mail ...
> 
> Hmm, wait, this patch is against hash.c, which already contains it (more or
> less). I was talking about the hash function in dict.c (see subject line).

  humpf, I got confused, sorry :-)

Daniel

-- 
Red Hat Virtualization group http://redhat.com/virtualization/
Daniel Veillard      | virtualization library  http://libvirt.org/
veillard redhat com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine  http://rpmfind.net/