Re: [xml] xmlChar * to char *

[Chris Peto <cpeto resource-solutions de>]

Daniel Veillard <veillard <at> redhat.com> writes:

> 
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 01:41:15PM +0100, Baurzhan Ismagulov wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 02:59:16AM -0500, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> > >   an xmlChar * has a stricter semantic than char *, that's why
> > > there is a macro to do this in one direction and not in the other one.
> > 
> > But gcc 4 warns about xmlChar * being passed to functions like strcpy; I
> > think the OP's question was whether there are any other solution than
> > casting.
> 
>   no, just cast.
> 
> Daniel
> 

I did a cast and still come up with a string that start with 0xc2.  My original 
character in xsd was &#xB0;.  By parsing I get, even after cast, c2b0 string.  
What must I do?

Thanks,
Chris Peto