Re: [xml] thanks a lot ---some more help ---

[Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>]

On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 10:32:35AM -0500, Rob Richards wrote:
> All that explains is what the three programs do and how to run them. 
> Just wanted to know if one way was better (or more accurate) than the other.

  the 3 programs tests a bit less, but allow testing on more platforms,
and do things like valgrind tests, etc ...

> Reason I ask is I ran the tests both ways on linux then tried it on 
> Windows. Windows failed for all the ent11 and ns7 tests using runtests 
> (while the nmake tests were passing as it ended up ignoring the line 
> endings) so I was tracking down why. Seems grabbing those files 
> result\.. (and it is only those 2 sets of files) from CVS under windows 
> has windows line endings while the same files retrieved under linux has 
> unix linefeeds. Its not a CVS setting as the other result files are 
> retrieved correctly with unix line endings. cvs diff shows no difference 
> between the files, so wondering where the linefeeds are coming from.

  Well may depend on your CVS client. I would say checkout on a sane platform
and just export the code to Windows from there. Also allows to make CVS diffs
without end of line brokeness, and in general to trust the tools.

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat http://redhat.com/
veillard redhat com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/