Re: [xml] Documentation improvement suggestion

[Cory Nelson <phrosty gmail com>]

How about doxygen?  I've used it in a number of projects, has always
been straightforward to use.

On 5/9/05, Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 05:13:17PM +0200, Stefan Kost wrote:
> > Hi Cory,
> >
> > the best IMHO would be to go back to gtk-doc, as this has been improved a
> > lot.
> 
>   you mean there is now a documentation on how do do the documentation,
> how to build it and the perl code is commented ? Then I may look at
> it when I have time or take a patch showing how to reintegrate it
> along with the existing system. I completely wrote my documentation
> tools forced after years of frustration with gtk-doc, a bare improvement
> won't cut it, but as a parallel back-end if there is documentation about
> it then why not.
> 
> Daniel
> 
> --
> Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Desktop team http://redhat.com/
> veillard redhat com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
> http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
> 


-- 
Cory Nelson
http://www.int64.org