[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [xml] xmlStrEqual() documentation
- From: "Oliver Stöneberg" <oliverst online de>
- To: veillard redhat com
- Cc: xml gnome org
- Subject: Re: [xml] xmlStrEqual() documentation
- Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 19:57:21 +0100
After reading it again, the first sentence is a mess. Should be
"Check if both strings are equal or have the same content."
IMO the "have the same content part" feels a bit redundant. Strings,
that are equal do have the same content...
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 03:40:56PM +0100, oliverst online de wrote:
> > xmlStrEqual() has a pretty bad sentence as documentation:
> >
> > "Check if both string are equal of have same content Should be a bit more readable and faster than xmlStrEqual()"
> >
> > There are a few errors in it:
> > - "string" should be "strings"
>
> done
>
> > - the two senetnce should be seperated with a dot
>
> done they are in separate lines in the source, though.
>
> > - xmlStrEqual() should be fester then xmlStrEqual()!?
>
> already fixed, it was just not propagated to docs yet.
>
> thanks, will commit :-)
>
> Daniel
>
> --
> Daniel Veillard | Red Hat http://redhat.com/
> veillard redhat com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
> http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]