[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [xml] Attribute indenting
- From: "Nicolas Mailhot" <nicolas mailhot laposte net>
- To: veillard redhat com
- Cc: xml gnome org
- Subject: Re: [xml] Attribute indenting
- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 15:53:28 +0200 (CEST)
On Jeu 28 avril 2005 15:29, Daniel Veillard a écrit :
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 02:41:31PM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>> > now do man indent, and count the options.
>>
>> Well, I doubt any user wants
>>
>> <foo xmlns:first="long uri sqlrvnLZ NQLZTJQLTJBLERLZJEL
>> VJZELJZLRBLZREVLZERVLajzlrjalzrvjlazekjlaz" xmlns:second="long uri 2
>> q;sfdv kghb elrh lerhylzreyjnlerylerjlertlz" xmlns:third="long uri 3
>> ljsdg
>> hlberjynlsry ejnlrt kjnmdrgnmfd,hnmr"/>
>
> I may take a patch, check include/libxml/xmlsave.h xmlSaveOption enums
> which would have to be augmented. The problem is that you need to keep
> track of the column number which is not fun, and probably very
> inefficient.
>
>> And you'll note your argument is somehow unfair - one of your example
>> shows no indenting at the element level though it didn't stop xmllint
>> (like most other tools) indenting them
>
> I'm not unfair. I expose that writing that code is very special case,
> not fun, probably hard to make efficient, and so far just got something
> which looks like a rant.
I'm sorry if it came out like this. I know writing software is hard, and
"there is no time to do this right now" is a perfectly fine answer with
me. Especially since doing this stuff requires column tracking, which I
was perfectly aware of (but I'd have loved to be wrong here)
"I don't see there is a problem, you must be mistaken" OTOH just asks for
more arguments, which I dutifully provided ;).
I fear the need will become more evident as namespaces are generalized -
they make the case for indenting attributes awfully clear ;(.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Mailhot
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]