Re: Unfortunately, not yet solved (Was: Re: Problem solved! (Was: Re: [xml] valgrind errrors with this small sample program))

[Bjorn Reese <breese mail1 stofanet dk>]

On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 19:11, Daniel Veillard wrote:

>   Now the only question is whether replacing memcmp by strncmp
> would really generate a difference. The best is to take one huge
> xml instance and try testSAX for both on it. 

I did a simple comparison between memcmp and strncmp on Solaris,
which suggested that memcmp is 25% faster than strncmp. You should
not take this as conclusive evidence though.