Re: [xml] parser warning: URI is not absolute

["Oleg A. Paraschenko" <olpa xmlhack ru>]

  Daniel, Marian,

  thank you very much for links.

On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 04:11:45 -0500
Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com> wrote:

> ...
>
>   Well then you have misssed a big debate which went afterward:
>   - a relatively clear description of the problem can be found at
>       http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2000/05/24/deviant/
>   - the official W3C result
>       http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xppa

  I've looked at it. I dislike idea of interpreting namespace declarations
as URI references. Anyway, I have to follow agreements.

>  In a nutshell:
>
> "the use of relative URI references in namespace declarations are
> deprecated"
>
> It's still conformant to the spec, that's why it's only a warning at the
> libxml2 level.

  By the way, there is no warning for the document

<z:doc xmlns:z='my-ns1'/>

  Maybe I just don't see difference with

<doc xmlns='my-ns1'/>

>  If you really want to understand why, you can read the archives of the
> xml-uri list for May-June 2000
>    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-uri/

  806 messages for May and 924 messages for June. Impressed.

> Daniel


-- 
Oleg