Re: [xml] "Next XML schema implementation steps (poll)"

[Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>]

  Excellent, I read the patch, I wouldn't have done it differently,
and it just works !
  Applied, commited with nearly no tweaking, it's in CVS,

    thanks a lot !

Daniel

On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 04:48:27AM +0200, Torkel Lyng wrote:
> Ooops, sorry! Seemed to manage to wreck that patch somehow, here's the fixed 
> patch (it works for me atleast :P)
>
> On Wednesday 18 August 2004 03:31, Torkel Lyng wrote:
> > I cut'n'pasted the Python binding code for RelaxNG and modified it a bit to
> > suite the XML-Schema code. Also added schema.py, a small validation
> > example. This code ain't reviewed or anything else like that, just modified
> > the existing RelaxNG code :)
> >
> > On Monday 16 August 2004 13:45, Robert Sanderson wrote:
> > > > So in short: this is a poll about what to implement next.
> > >
> > > I'll put my hand up again for a Python binding to the existing XML schema
> > > code! :)
> > >
> > > (There's a Bugzilla RFE for this already)
> > >
> > > Rob

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Desktop team http://redhat.com/
veillard redhat com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/