[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [xml] xmlDoc or xmlNode
- From: "WebShark" <webshark ono com>
- To: <xml gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [xml] xmlDoc or xmlNode
- Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 10:52:24 +0200
----- Original Message -----
From: <aliban gmx net>
To: <xml gnome org>
Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 9:57 PM
Subject: [xml] xmlDoc or xmlNode
> hello list.
> i have some kind of benchmark question.
>
> for my app i need to parse many little xml nodes...
>
> in case i get a buffer filled with an xml "node" i have to build a
> tree and then analyse it... i can parse the buffer with
>
> xmlDocPtr ptxmlDocPtr;
> ptxmlDocPtr = xmlParseMemory(ptchData, iSize);
> xmlFreeDoc(ptxmlDocPtr);
>
> whatever this would happen quite many times...
> therefor i thought it might be less waste of cpu by not creating a
> doc eacht time but instead to create/delete a node of a general doc
> with the buffer.
>
> Is it less cpu consuming to create/delete a node each time or does it
>
> make no difference?
> how to parse a buffer directly in a node? i would need a function
> node xmlParseMemoryToParent(doc, parent, ptchData, iSize);
>
> does it exist?
>
> sorry for asking,
> ed
================================
http://www.actunia.com
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]