Re: [xml] Patch for base64Binary datatype.

[Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>]

On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 02:04:59PM -0400, Anthony Carrico wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 09:40:20PM +0100, Sander Vesik wrote:
> > Anthony Carrico wrote:
> > >+           Ignore all stray characters? (yes, currently)
> > >+           Worry about long lines? (no, currently)
> 
> > I think the 'lines of at most 76 characters' part should be binned when
> > used inside xml - It doesn't look like a useful restriction and introduces
> > significant whitespace to documents that might otherwise not have it.
> 
> Good, then you'll be happy with the status quo. I don't know how other
> implementers have interpreted the issue, but I think you are correct
> that the line length restriction doesn't make as much sense outside of
> the smtp/mime context.

  Your implementation passed all James Clark tests on this datatype
which sounds pretty good to me, though none of them have lines with
more than 60 characters.

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard redhat com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/