[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
RE: SV: [xml] windows binary with different calling
- From: "Zlatkovic, Igor" <Igor Zlatkovic Dresdner-Bank com>
- To: "'Vakoc, Mark'" <Mark_Vakoc jdedwards com>, xml gnome org
- Subject: RE: SV: [xml] windows binary with different calling
- Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 18:39:27 +0200
> For sake of argument I do. Currently I manually modify the headers of
> the other library b/c most of their functions have macros in place to
> declare the calling convention so I have to go in and add the
> macros to
> the functions I use that are missing them.
>
> Your comments on the cause being the default in the VC IDE is a little
> out of touch. There are legitimate reasons to use either
> convention --
> but that's besides the point. The real point is people don't always
> have a choice. My app is cdecl, libx* is cdecl, and the monster
> application I link to is stdcall. Oh well.
Well, then your case is exactly what I described as the only good reason to
put those declarations in headers. I'm not against it anymore. :-)
Ciao,
Igor
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]