[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [xml] xmlwriter
- From: Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>
- To: Jeroen Cranendonk <j cranendonk emaxx nl>
- Cc: xml gnome org
- Subject: Re: [xml] xmlwriter
- Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 16:45:34 -0400
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 10:33:57PM +0200, Jeroen Cranendonk wrote:
> Hello :)
> I've been fiddling with the xmlwriter idea some more (see previous posts), and
> wrote the start of some code of an implementation of what I had in mind :)
> it only writes elements right now and has a million things wrong with it,
> but I'd like to see what others think, and if I'm on the right path at all ;)
> The code as source or tgz'ed source is to be found at:
> http://dolphin.student.utwente.nl/xmlwriter/
> the header file has some relevant urls (Api I'm moddeling after) as comment
> in the first lines.
>
> Please have a look at it, pick out any mistakes, lemme know what you think
> of the code and the idea, and if you're bored help expand it, 'd be greatly
> appreciated ^-^
>
> (or let me know it's dumb, why it's dumb, and what I should use/do instead ;)
I had a very quick look at the .c file. Main reproach is stylistic
using // comments and not commenting the functions individually. If you
don't comment them when writing them how do you express to an user what
they are supposed to do ? It's the very beginning , but I see nothing
obviously wrong with the code itself
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard redhat com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]