[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [xml] validation discrepency
- From: Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>
- To: T A <tedaetc yahoo com>
- Cc: xml gnome org
- Subject: Re: [xml] validation discrepency
- Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 05:35:45 -0500
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 08:14:29AM -0800, T A wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been working with the libxml coding examples, parser2.c and reader2.c and I am seeing a discrepency in the DTD validations. I have an XML file and corresponding DTD that are validated by xmllint and the parser2 test program but not validated by reader2.
> What is the difference between
> The calls to xmlCtxtReadFile like so
>
> doc = xmlCtxtReadFile(ctxt, filename, NULL, XML_PARSE_DTDVALID);
>
> in parser2 and the call to xmlReaderForFile
>
> reader = xmlReaderForFile(filename, NULL,
> XML_PARSE_DTDATTR | /* default DTD attributes */
> XML_PARSE_NOENT | /* substitute entities */
> XML_PARSE_DTDVALID); /* validate with the DTD */
>
> in reader2? Where is the error?
within xmlreader.c code. The XML_PARSE_DTDVALID option should have
forced a validation flag in the ctxt but didn't. The difference isn't
between those 2 calls but somewhere else in the initializations done by
xmllint when using --valid. This is fixed in CVS, in the meantime add
xmlTextReaderSetParserProp(reader, XML_PARSER_VALIDATE, 1);
to force the setup of the flag in the reader.
thanks for the report,
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard redhat com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]