Re: [xml] Schemas handling as different lib

[Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>]

On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 01:03:19PM +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, xml! How are you?
>
>   Why schemas handling is done (is doing :)) inside libxml2? I think,
>   XSchema validation is as far from XML parsing as XSLT
>   transformation, and it will be better to make it different library
>   (libxshema, for example).

  No because it is needed to build a tree with the defauted values.
I also want to be able to Schemas validate at the SAx stream level
at some point. Please look at the architecture picture on the web site

>   Many application doesn't need XSchema validations, and it is not
>   small piece of code...

  Simply don't compile it in ! It's a configure time option, moreover
most decent linker infrastructure do NOT link all the library code
in tha applications, only the parts needed.

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard redhat com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/