Re: [xml] XML library evaluation (fwd)

[Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>]

On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 06:23:33PM +0100, Dan Ellis wrote:
> On 13 Jun 2002, John Fleck wrote:
> > If the problem instead is in your use of the library, Daniel and the
> > other participants in the list can help you understand how to use it 
> > correctly.
> 
> Daniel appears to have taken the criticism badly. Indeed, it was harsh,

  Well it's just a bit of frustration. I know there might be problems,
but I can't get access to their description to handle them.

> Daniel, I'm sorry if you misinterpreted the intent of my post. It was not

  yeah, sorry too, as some of the long time people on that list may know
I sometime overreact :-)

> I'd hate to see it overlooked because of our own misuse of it. Hopefully
> the information you've provided so far will be of some use to us (and
> anyone else wishing to integrate libxml2 with C++ code).

  Now if I could get a unified single C++ binding agreed upon by every
C++ users that may help too, but this looks unprobable...

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard redhat com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/