On Sun, Jul 21, 2002 at 05:43:53PM -0700, Aleksey Sanin wrote:Hi, Daniel! This question was discussed some time ago but I could not understand do we have any agreement or not. And I would like to raise it again because it looks like I need this functionality too :)Argh ....So the question is: can we add "void* private" member to the "struct xmlNs"? This pointer will be used by application to store application specific data and LibXML will simply always ignore it. There were two suggestions: 1) make struct xmlNs similar to structures for other node types and put "void * private" on the second place (adv.: simplicity and following standard; dis. : this breaks binary compatibility) 2) add "void* private" to the end of struct xmlNs (adv.: binary compatible; dis.: "special case" for applications) As far as I can understand, we could not go with option 1) because of binary compatibility. I would like to find out, can the implement option 2) (it's ugly but it gives me what I want :) ).then 2) please but make the field name "_private" like on the others nodes. It also avoid the C++ reserved name problem. Daniel