Re: [xml] Pasting fragment

[Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>]

On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 03:50:37PM +0200, chrisbee xml swing be wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 01:41:52PM +0200, chrisbee xml swing be wrote:
> > looks okay a priori. But I really can't understand why you don't
> > want to pass node->doc to xmlParseBalancedChunkMemory() , to later
> > update it everywhere in the resulting nodes ... This makes absolutely no
> > sense to me !
> Because I do some tests before and calling xmlParseBalancedChunkMemory() 
> initialized doc->children with the result node llist. But it seems that 
> this happens only if doc->children is NULL (Is this a bug ?). At this 

  I don't see in the code how this could happen. It doesn't touch
doc->children !

> time, I (wrongly) concluded that when a doc argument was provided, 
> xmlParseBalancedChunkMemory() replaces doc->children with the result 
> nodes of parsing.

  No it doesn't try to put the nodes in the tree, but needs a document
handle to be able to lookup entity references from the document, set the
correct doc pointer to the node generated, etc...

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard redhat com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/